Home
Framing
"The term frame dependence means that the way people behave depends on the way that their decision problems are framed."
Shefrin (2000)
Framing is a cognitive heuristic in which people tend to reach conclusions based on the 'framework' within which a situation was presented.
[KaTv00] "The rational theory of choice assumes description invariance: equivalent formulations of a choice problem should give rise to the same preference order (Arrow, 1982). Contrary to this assumption, there is much evidence that variations in the framing of options (e.g., in terms of gains or losses) yield systematically different preferences (Tversky and Kahneman, 1986)."
Framing
News is interpreted in a way that supports the trend
- Loss aversion
- regret
- mental accounting
framing:
investors indeed realize their gains more readily than their losses. And the winning investments investors chose to sell continue to outperform the losers they hold on to in subsequent months.
Framing - with reliance on how information is presented, a judgment is made on the benefit of a choice
"Empirical studies show that decisions deviate from the predictions of expected utility theory and violate their axiomatic foundations. Hence, many generalizations to non-expected utility theory have been developped. But empirically they did not provide an improvement over the standard approach. In this paper random errors are integrated in an expected utility framework. Such errors occur when agents have limited information processing capacities. A performance criterion is provided to measure the expected success of behavioral strategies. A special class of robust decision rules and its properties are analyzed. It is argued that in case of bounded rationality the evolution will select heuristics from an open class of decision rules due to performance differences."
Pasche
Related Topics
Seminal Works
Bibliography
APANOVITCH, A.M., D. MCCARTHY and P. SALOVEY, 2003. Using message framing to motivate HIV testing among low-income, ethnic minority women . Health Psychology. [Cited by 12 ]
BAZERMAN, M.H., 1983. The relevance of Kahneman and Tversky's concept of framing to organization behavior. [Cited by 12 ]
BIAS, F., 2002. Heuristics, biases and strategic . Psychologist. [not cited]
BLESS, H., T. BETSCH and A. FRANZEN, 1998. Framing the framing e? ect: The impact of context cues on solutions to theAsian disease'problem . Eur. J. Soc. Psychol. [Cited by 12 ]
BOHNET, I. and R.D. COOTER, 2003. Expressive Law: Framing or Equilibrium Selection . Kennedy School of Government and UCB School of Law. [Cited by 16 ]
BOON, S.D. and D.W. GRIFFIN, 1996. The construction of risk in relationships: The role of framing in decisions about intimate … . Personal Relationships. [Cited by 5 ]
CHIEN, Y.C., C. LIN and J. WORTHLEY, 1996. Effect of framing on adolescents' decision making . Perceptual and Motor Skills. [Cited by 2 ]
COOKSON, R., 2000. Framing effects in public goods experiments . Experimental Economics. [Cited by 22 ]
DETWEILER, J.B., et al. , 1999. Message framing and sunscreen use: Gain-framed messages motivate beach-goers . Health Psychology. [Cited by 43 ]
DRUCKMAN, J.N., 2001. Using Credible Advice to Overcome Framing Effects . Journal of Law Economics and Organization. [Cited by 14 ]
DRUCKMAN, J.N., 2001. Evaluating Framing Effects . Journal of Economic Psychology. [Cited by 10 ]
DRUCKMAN, J.N., 2001. The Implications of Framing Effects for Citizen Competence. . Political Behavior. [Cited by 29 ]
DUCHON, D., K.J. DUNEGAN and S.L. BARTON, 1989. Framing the problem and making decisions: the facts are not enough . IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management. [Cited by 4 ]
EDWARDS, A., et al. , 2001. Presenting Risk Information—A Review of the Eşects of ‘‘Framing''and other Manipulations … . Journal of Health Communication. [Cited by 44 ]
FRAMES, I.O.F.I., FRAMING AND RISK RELATED DECISION MAKING BEHAVIOUR: DIAGNOSING THE . sbaer.uca.edu. [not cited]
FUJII, S. and K. TAKEMURA, 2003. Contingent focus model of Decision Framing under Risk . [Cited by 1 ]
GIBBS, B., 1997. Predisposing the Decision Maker Versus Framing the Decision: A Consumer-Manipulation Approach to … . Marketing Letters. [Cited by 10 ]
GIGERENZER, G., 1996. On narrow norms and vague heuristics: A reply to Kahneman and Tversky (1996) . Psychological Review. [Cited by 79 ]
GREEN, D., et al. , 1998. Referendum contingent valuation, anchoring, and willingness to pay for public goods . Resource and Energy Economics. [Cited by 72 ]
HOGARTH, R.M., 1982. Question framing and response consistency. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. [Cited by 12 ]
JAMAL, K., P.E. JOHNSON and R.G. BERRYMAN, 1995. Detecting framing effects in financial statements . Contemporary Accounting Research. [Cited by 5 ]
JOHNSON, E.J., et al. , 1993. Framing, probability distortions, and insurance decisions . Journal of Risk and Uncertainty. [Cited by 77 ]
JOHNSON, E.J., S. BELLMAN and G.L. LOHSE, 2002. Defaults, Framing, and Privacy: Why Opting In? Opting Out . Marketing Letters. [Cited by 15 ]
KAHNEMAN, D. and A. SCHWARTZ, 1997. … OF MYOPIA AND LOSS AVERSION ON RISK TAKING: AN EXPERIMENTAL TEST* Richard H. Thaler Amos Tversky . The Quarterly Journal of Economics. [not cited]
KAHNEMAN, D. and A. TVERSKY, 1981. The Framing of Decisions and the Psychology of Choice.”. Science. [Cited by 5 ]
KAHNEMAN, D. and A. TVERSKY, 1986. Rational choice and the Framing of Decisions in Hogart R. M., Reder MW Rational choice-The Contrast …. [Cited by 2 ]
KAHNEMAN, D. and A. TVERSKY, 1986. Rational Choice and the Framing of Decisions. Journal of Business. [Cited by 32 ]
KAHNEMAN, D. and M.W. RIEPE, 1998. Aspects of investor psychology . Journal of Portfolio Management. [Cited by 49 ]
KAHNEMAN, D., Information about: . ideas.repec.org. [not cited]
KAHNEMAN, D., 2003. A Psychological Perspective on Economics . American Economic Review. [Cited by 21 ]
KAHNEMAN, D., 2003. Maps of Bounded Rationality: Psychology for Behavioral Economics . American Economic Review. [Cited by 54 ]
KAHNEMAN, D., 2003. A perspective on judgment and choice: Mapping bounded rationality . American Psychologist. [Cited by 44 ]
KAHNEMAN, D., et al. , 2000. Choices, Values, and Frames . print.google.com. [Cited by 697 ]
KAHNEMAN, D., I. RITOV and D. SCHKADE, 1999. Economic preferences or attitude expressions? An analysis of dollar responses to public issues . Journal of Risk and Uncertainty. [Cited by 68 ]
KAHNEMAN, D., Nobel Prizes 2002. MAPS OF BOUNDED RATIONALITY: A PERSPECTIVE ON INTUITIVE JUDGMENT AND CHOICE . [Cited by 11 ]
KANNER, M.D., 2004. Framing and the Role of the Second Actor: An Application of Prospect Theory to Bargaining . Political Psychology. [Cited by 1 ]
KELLARIS, J.J., B.A. BOYLE and R.F. DAHLSTROM, 1994. Framing and situational ethics . Marketing Letters. [Cited by 4 ]
KELLARIS, J.J., F.R. KARDES and T. DINOVO, 1995. Exploring the boundaries of the framing effect: The moderating roles of disparate expected values … . Marketing Letters. [Cited by 1 ]
KIRCHLER, E., B. MACIEJOVSKY and M. WEBER, Irrelevant Information, Framing Effects, and Market Behavior-An Experimental Analysis- . socialpolitik.de. [not cited]
KIRCHLER, E., B. MACIEJOVSKY and M. WEBER, 2001. Framing effects on asset markets: An experimental analysis . [Cited by 7 ]
KOPP, J., 1995. … —eine Replikation und Modifikation des “Asian disease problem” von Kahneman und Tversky. Zeitschrift fuer Sozialpsychologie. [Cited by 4 ]
KRANTZ, D., P. SLOVIC and E. WEBER, Laboratory Project 1 Mental Representation and Framing in Individual and Group Decisions . climatedecisions.ciesin.columbia.edu. [not cited]
KUEHBERGER, A., et al. , 2002. Framing decisions: Hypothetical and real . Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. [Cited by 13 ]
LEBOEUF, R.A. and E. SHAFIR, 2003. Deep thoughts and shallow frames: on the susceptibility to framing effects . Journal of Behavioral Decision Making. [Cited by 7 ]
LEVIN, I.P., et al. , 2002. A new look at framing effects: distribution of effect sizes, individual differences, and … . Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. [Cited by 18 ]
LEVIN, I.P., S.L. SCHNEIDER and G.J. GAETH, 1998. All frames are not created equal: A typology and critical analysis of framing effects . Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. [Cited by 96 ]
LEVY, J.S., 2002. Daniel Kahneman: Judgment, Decision, and Rationality . PS: Political Science and Politics. [Cited by 1 ]
LI, S. and A.S. ADAMS, 1995. Is there something more important behind framing. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. [Cited by 6 ]
MANDEL, D.R., 2001. Gain-loss framing and choice: Separating outcome formulations from descriptor formulations . Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. [Cited by 5 ]
MCDERMOTT, R., 2001. The Psychological Ideas of Amos Tversky and Their Relevance for Political Science . Journal of Theoretical Politics. [Cited by 12 ]
MCKENZIE, C.R.M., J.D. NELSON and C.R.M. MCKENZIE, 2003. What a speaker's choice of frame reveals: Reference points, frame selection, and framing effects . Psychonomic Bulletin and Review. [Cited by 12 ]
MCNEIL, B., S.G. PAUKER and H.C. SOX, 1981. On the 39. Tversky A, Kahneman D. The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science. [Cited by 1 ]
MOGILIANSKY, A.L., S. ZAMIR and H. ZWIRN, Type Indeterminacy-A Model of the KT-man (Kahneman Tversky) . cmla.ens-cachan.fr. [not cited]
MOGILIANSKY, A.L., S. ZAMIR and H. ZWIRN, Type Indeterminacy: A Model of the KT (Kahneman-Tversky)-man . enpc.fr. [not cited]
MONTIER, James, 2002. Global Equity Strategy: Part Man, Part Monkey
NYGREN, T.E., 1998. … and low-risk win-lose opportunities in a risky decision-making task: Is it framing, or affect, or … . Motivation and Emotion. [Cited by 5 ]
PASCHE, Markus, An Approach to Robust Decision Making: The Rationality of Heuristic Behavior
PATH-DEPENDENCE, F.A.S., 2002. DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMICS DISCUSSION PAPER SERIES . way. [not cited]
POINTS, E., 2005. The Effect of Primed and Framed Reference Points on Product Attribute Importance . Advances in Consumer Research. [not cited]
RAPPAPORT, Alfred and Michael J. MAUBOUSSIN, 2001. Pitfalls to Avoid
RITOV, I., J. BARON and J.C. HERSHEY, 1993. Framing effects in the evaluation of multiple risk reduction . Journal of Risk and Uncertainty. [Cited by 9 ]
ROTHMAN, A.J. and P. SALOVEY, 1997. Shaping perceptions to motivate healthy behavior: The role of message framing . Psychological Bulletin. [Cited by 101 ]
ROTHMAN, A.J., et al. , 1993. The influence of message framing on intentions to perform health behaviors. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. [Cited by 48 ]
RUSSELL, Thomas and Richard THALER, 1985. The Relevance of Quasi Rationality in Competitive Markets , The American Economic Review , Volume 75, Issue 5 (Dec., 1985), 1071-1082.
SCHEUFELE, D.A., 2000. Agenda-Setting, Priming, and Framing Revisited: Another Look at Cognitive Effects of Political … . Mass Communication & Society. [Cited by 8 ]
SCHNEIDER, S.L., 1992. Framing and conflict: Aspiration level contingency, the status quo, and current theories of risky … . Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and …. [Cited by 37 ]
SCHRADER, R., Framing-Ansaetze und die Standardtheorie der Person . personal.uni-jena.de. [not cited]
SCHRADER, R., Framing-Anstze und die Standardtheorie der Person . personal.uni-jena.de. [not cited]
SHAFFER, T.R., et al. , Ethnicity and Framing Effects on the Distribution of Satisfaction Responses . sbaer.uca.edu. [not cited]
SHEFRIN, Hersh, 2000. Beyond Greed and Fear : Understanding Behavioral Finance and the Psychology of Investing .
SINGER, A.E., et al. , 1991. Ethical myopia: The case of“framing” by framing . Journal of Business Ethics. [Cited by 3 ]
SMITH, S., 2000. … Issues, CandyIndustry, juin, 22-23. TVERSKY A. et KAHNEMAN D.(1981), The Framing of Decisions and …. Science. [not cited]
STANOVICH, K.E. and R.F. WEST, 1998. Individual differences in framing and conjunction effects . Thinking and Reasoning. [Cited by 19 ]
STORK, R. and E.H. WITTE, Framing Effekt: Der getrennte Einfluss von Wahrscheinlichkeiten und Utilities . uni-hamburg.de. [not cited]
TANNER, C. and D.L. MEDIN, Psychonomic Bulletin and Review. Protected values: No omission bias and no framing effects . [Cited by 3 ]
TANNER, C. and L.M. DOUGLAS, Running head: PROTECTED VALUES AND FRAMING EFFECTS . psych.northwestern.edu. [not cited]
TINDALE, R.S., S. SHEFFEY and L.A. SCOTT, 1993. Framing and group decision-making: Do cognitive changes parallel preference changes. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. [Cited by 16 ]
TRAUB, S. and C. SEIDL, FRAMING AND JUDGMENTS OF FAIRNESS IN TAXATION . fundp.ac.be. [not cited]
TVERSKY and KAHNEMAN, 1981. The Framing of Decisions and the Psychology of Choice
TVERSKY and KAHNEMAN, 1986. Rational Choice and the Framing of Decisions
TVERSKY, A. and D. KAHNEMAN, DOI: 10.1086/296365 . journals.uchicago.edu. [not cited]
TVERSKY, A. and D. KAHNEMAN, and----(1986),“Rational Choice and the Framing of Decisions,”. Journal of Business. [Cited by 3 ]
TVERSKY, A. and D. KAHNEMAN, 1981. The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice . Science. [Cited by 1057 ]
TVERSKY, A. and D. KAHNEMAN, 1981. The framing and the psychology of choice. Science. [Cited by 4 ]
TVERSKY, A. and D. KAHNEMAN, 1981. The framing e ff ect of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science. [Cited by 3 ]
TVERSKY, A. and D. KAHNEMAN, 1981. The Framing of Decisions and the Probability of Choice. Science. [Cited by 5 ]
TVERSKY, A. and D. KAHNEMAN, 1981. The framing of decisions and the psychologyof choice. Science. [Cited by 3 ]
TVERSKY, A. and D. KAHNEMAN, 1981. The framing of decisions and the rationality of choice. Science. [Cited by 50 ]
TVERSKY, A. and D. KAHNEMAN, 1981. The Framing of Descions and the Psychology of Choice. Science. [Cited by 1 ]
TVERSKY, A. and D. KAHNEMAN, 1981. The framingof decisions and the psychology of choice. Science. [Cited by 2 ]
TVERSKY, A. and D. KAHNEMAN, 1985. The framing of decisions and philosophy of choice. Behavioral Decision Making. [Cited by 3 ]
TVERSKY, A. and D. KAHNEMAN, 1986. Rational choice and the framing of decision . Journal of Business. [Cited by 529 ]
TVERSKY, A. and D. KAHNEMAN, 1986. Choice and the Framing of Decisions. Journal of Business. [Cited by 1 ]
TVERSKY, A. and D. KAHNEMAN, 1986. Rational Choice and the Framing of Decisions and the Psychology of Choice. Journal of Business. [not cited]
TVERSKY, A. and D. KAHNEMAN, 1986. Rational choice and the framing of decisions.'ournal of Business, vol. 59. pp. S. [not cited]
TVERSKY, A. and D. KAHNEMAN, 1987. 'Rational choice and the framing of decisions', in-RXUQDO RI% XVLQHVV, 59, S251-S278. Reprinted …. [Cited by 1 ]
TVERSKY, A. and D. KAHNEMAN, 1990. Rational choice and the framing of decisions. The Limits of Rationality. KS Cook and M. Levi. [Cited by 1 ]
TVERSKY, A. and D. KAHNEMAN, 1992. Advances in prospect theory: Cumulative representation of uncertainty . Journal of Risk and Uncertainty. [Cited by 748 ]
TVERSKY, A., mos, and Daniel Kahneman. 1981.“. The Framing Decisions and the Psychology of. [Cited by 2 ]
TVERSKY, A., 1986. Kahneman; D.‘Rational Choice and the Framing of Decisions'. Journal of Business. [Cited by 2 ]
TVERSKY, A., lity. en D. Kahneman (1990).‘Rational Choice and the Framing of Decisions'. K. Cook en M. Levi (red.), The Limits of Ratio. [not cited]
WANG, M. and P.S. FISCHBECK, 2004. Incorporating Framing into Prospect Theory Modeling: A Mixture-Model Approach . Journal of Risk and Uncertainty. [Cited by 2 ]
WANG, X.T., F. SIMONS and S. BREDART, 2001. Social cues and verbal framing in risky choice . Journal of Behavioral Decision Making. [Cited by 9 ]
WRIGHT, G. and P. GOODWIN, 2002. RESEARCH NOTES AND COMMENTARIES ELIMINATING A FRAMING BIAS BY USING SIMPLE INSTRUCTIONS TO ‘THINK … . Strategic Management Journal. [Cited by 1 ]
WU, C.S., F.F. CHENG and H.H. LIN, How Do the Internet Buyers' Decisions Be Affected?—An Experimental Study of Risky Choice Framing … . pacis-net.org. [not cited]
YAMAGISHI, K., 2002. Effects of valence and framing in decision-making: Assessing decision-makers' perceived domains of … . Japanese Psychological Research. [Cited by 1 ]
YAMAGISHI, K., 2003. Effects of valence and framing in decision making II: Estimating subjective weighting 1 . Japanese Psychological Research. [not cited]